Toxicity of Common Plastics: What We Need to Know

Polyethylene (PE) and Polypropylene (PP): Hidden Risks

Polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP) are two of the world’s most widely manufactured types of plastics, with applications ranging from plastic bags to food packaging, medical equipment, and many others. These plastics are generally looked at as being less dangerous than the other varieties, especially because they do not give off high volumes of dangerous substances when exposed to a normal environment. However, their regular use implies their constant interaction with factors such as ultraviolet (UV) radiation, mechanical abrasion, and temperature differences to form microplastics.

The major risk associated with both PE and PP is that they are prone to degrade into microplastic in environments that are capable of moving into water bodies. In the current study, the effects of PE and PP microplastics present in water on the oxidative stress, immune-related genes, and lipid peroxidation of marine organisms have been highlighted. In epidemiological investigations with mussels and fish containing microplastics, the relation between the uptake of these particles and physiological stress reactions, for instance, enzyme inhibition and the release of inflammatory factors, has been confirmed. This implies that PE and PP are not as harmless as some may wish to believe, particularly when they disaggregate and lodge themselves in the tissues of organisms.

Polystyrene (PS): A Double-Edged Sword

It is identified as polystyrene that is used for packaging materials, disposable dinnerware, and even in the insulation sector. PS, on the other hand, is one of the most hazardous forms of plastic from a toxicological standpoint among widespread polymer materials. They also expose a worker to toxic styrene monomers, which are potentially carcinogenic to humans according to the IARC. Research has also indicated that styrene in some polystyrene containers migrates to food through heat or when the food is exposed to any form of acidity, thus posing some serious health effects on human beings.

In addition, PS is one of the most vulnerable to breaking down into microplastics, which, of course, are characterized by their ability to enter the food chain and thereby affect marine life. Experiments conducted on mussels and other organisms from aquatic habitats demonstrated that PS microplastics can bioaccumulate in tissues and cause oxidative stress and inflammation. Sometimes these microplastics can hinder feeding and digestion, and this will just be an added stressor on marine life. The risk density of PS is even in digestion because it tends to adsorb other toxic compounds, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and become bioavailable when ingested.

Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC): A Chemical Hazard

Polyvinyl chloride, popularly known as PVC, is common in construction-related merchandise and pipes, as well as in medical instruments. The leaching of additives from the matrix, including phthalates and stabilizers, is the main hazard of PVC products. In particular, the group of phthalates is considered a group of endocrine disturbing agents that may cause the degradation of hormones and their formation. Such chemicals are known to have an impact on the reproductive system, teratogenic effects that affect infants, and even resin importance after long use.

Furthermore, chlorine is used to make PVC, and dioxin emissions are common during the production of PVC. Dioxins are referred to as Ah-toxins and are twenty-five times as toxic as DDT; they affect the reproductive and developmental systems, have effects on the immune system, and are carcinogenic. Upon exposure to heat, in cases like uncontrolled waste burning or PVC products, the dioxins are let go to circle the ecosystem, and this is very dangerous to the public health of any given society.

Microplastics and Nanoplastics: A Growing Concern

Among the new trends, one of the most troubling issues is the production of microplastics and nanoplastics, which are particles with sizes of up to 5 mm and 100 nm, respectively. Not only did they find that these tiny particles are consumed by many sea organisms, but they can also be translocated into human tissues. They are present in fish and shellfish, water that people drink, and air that individuals breathe, but their effects on human health remain unknown.

Some studies show that microplastics may lead to physical irritation of cell tissues and cause inflammation, as well as serve as vectors that transport other toxic chemicals. For instance, microplastics have been evidenced to be ingested by fish and invertebrates, which will affect their feeding efficiency rate and growth and may lead to death. Since microplastics are capable of accumulating and remaining in ecosystems for long durations, the negative impacts of microplastics on organisms, waters, and sediment are expected to increase with time and hence are expected to cause long-term, persistent harm.

Of the two categories, voluntarily released micro- and nanoplastics originating from nanoplastics are even more serious. For these particles can go through biological membranes, including the cell membranes of human bodies, thus causing cellular damage and toxity. Initial research shows that nanoplastics can contribute to oxidation, alter membrane integrity, and impair cellular functions. However, further studies are still required to establish a complete understanding of the later biomolecular and health consequences of nanoplastic exposure.

Plastics as Vectors for Other Pollutants

Another major issue that has been of a lot of importance concerning the toxicity of plastics is their capability to uptake and transfer other pollutants in the environment. Microplastics have been demonstrated to transport POPs, heavy metals, and other hazardous substances from one locale to another. Plastics already contain these toxic chemicals, but when marine organisms consume these plastics, they not only consume the plastic but also the adsorbed toxic chemicals as well.

Research has shown that plastics have the ability to absorb chemicals such as PAHs, PCBs, and heavy metals from the surrounding environment. Once these pollutants are consumed by organisms, they are released into the tissues of the organisms and cause very toxic effects such as endocrine disruption, immune suppression, developmental abnormalities, etc. Plastics’ effects on the environment and human health are greatly worsened by being able to carry around other pollutants, making them a major concern in scientific research and policy making.

The Need for Comprehensive Toxicity Assessments

The dangers associated with toxicological risks of plastics are slowly emerging, but much more is still left unnoticed regarding this vice. Plastic toxicity evaluation faces several challenges, including the ability to account for the wide variety of plastics and additives. Every plastic has its own rate of degradation and releases different chemical compounds; hence, it is not possible to template a plastic by its toxicity.

Furthermore, most of the earlier research has focused on the environmental impact of plastics, particularly in aquatic environments. However, Desert et al. acknowledge that microplastics and nanoplastics are now detected in human food chains and drinking water, but it is still unclear how much of a health risk they pose to humans. Due to this exposure to a low level of plastics and its associated chemicals, identifying the long-term impacts on the human body is important in coming up with the necessary legal measures and general population precaution measures.

Conclusion

Concerns on the toxicity of common plastics have been of growing concern across the communities as well as environmentalists. Specifically, while professionals use polyethylene and polypropylene every day, it is dangerous because such materials are capable of degrading into microplastic and nanoplastic forms that have adverse effects on the environment as well as human life. Polystyrene and PVC, which outgas hazardous substances such as styrene and phthalates, respectively, are even more dangerous in the short term because heat and UV radiation degrade their surfaces. So while it remains a global practice to manufacture and use plastics at an alarming rate, then there must be appropriate research done to ascertain the toxicological effects that accrue to the user and the environment as a whole.

References

1. Pagano, M., Fabrello, J., Multisanti, C.R., Zicarelli, G., Ciscato, M., Boldrin, F., Giacobbe, S., Matozzo, V. and Faggio, C., 2023. A first insight into haemocytes of Pinctada imbricata radiata: A morpho‐functional characterization. Microscopy Research and Technique, 86(3), pp.368-377.
2. Aliko, V., Multisanti, C.R., Turani, B. and Faggio, C., 2022. Get rid of marine pollution: bioremediation an innovative, attractive, and successful cleaning strategy. Sustainability, 14(18), p.11784.
3. Lombardo, J., Solomando, A., Cohen-Sánchez, A., Pinya, S., Tejada, S., Ferriol, P., Mateu-Vicens, G., Box, A., Faggio, C. and Sureda, A., 2022. Effects of human activity on markers of oxidative stress in the intestine of Holothuria tubulosa, with special reference to the presence of microplastics. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(16), p.9018.
4. Davis, E.K. and Raja, S., 2020. Sources and impact of microplastic pollution in Indian aquatic ecosystem: a review. Sustain Mining, Special, (1).
5. Gove, J.M., Whitney, J.L., McManus, M.A., Lecky, J., Carvalho, F.C., Lynch, J.M., Li, J., Neubauer, P., Smith, K.A., Phipps, J.E. and Kobayashi, D.R., 2019. Prey-size plastics are invading larval fish nurseries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(48), pp.24143-24149.
6. Zimmermann, L., Dierkes, G., Ternes, T.A., Völker, C. and Wagner, M., 2019. Benchmarking the in vitro toxicity and chemical composition of plastic consumer products. Environmental science & technology, 53(19), pp.11467-11477.
7. Picó, Y. and Barceló, D., 2019. Analysis and prevention of microplastics pollution in water: current perspectives and future directions. ACS omega, 4(4), pp.6709-6719.